Docket Room
SR 100·MI·senate

A resolution to urge the federal government to issue clarifying rules or guidance explaining that claims applicable to state surprise billing laws must go through the state dispute resolution process, rather than the federal independent dispute resolution process.

Passed One ChamberFiled Mar 11, 2026
Sponsor: Roger Hauck
Latest Action

RULES SUSPENDED

Mar 17, 2026

Summary

The Michigan Senate passed a resolution asking the federal government to issue guidance that surprise‑billing claims covered by Michigan’s law must be handled through the state’s dispute‑resolution system instead of the federal independent dispute‑resolution process. It seeks to keep out‑of‑network payment disputes within Michigan’s established arbitration framework and curb providers from bypassing state protections. The resolution cites data showing many providers are using the federal process, which has led to higher payments and could raise insurance costs for consumers.

AI-generated summary — may be incomplete or inaccurate. Verify against the official bill text.

Share

Track this bill

Get real-time alerts when SR 100 changes status, plus AI-powered summaries and stage predictions.

Sign up free
Docket Room · Nonpartisan legislative tracking
Docket Room IntelligencePro

Ask about your legislation

I can analyze your tracked bills, upcoming hearings, and recent changes.

AI-generated · Nonpartisan · Not legal advice