Docket Room.
HB 172·MD·house

Municipalities - Enforcement Officers - Body-Worn Cameras

FailedFiled Oct 9, 2025
Sponsor: Schindler
Latest Action

Hearing 3/31 at 1:00 p.m. (Senate)

Mar 24, 2026

Summary

The bill adds municipal enforcement officers to the definition of "law enforcement officer" for the exception that lets them record oral communications with body‑worn cameras. It lets cities and towns adopt ordinances or resolutions to permit such cameras and requires them to publish a usage policy that matches state police training standards. The measure aims to standardize recording practices and clarify legal authority.

AI-generated summary — may be incomplete or inaccurate. Verify against the official bill text.

Ask about HB 172

3 free questions a day, no account

Hearings

History

  1. Hearing 3/31 at 1:00 p.m.
  2. Referred Judicial Proceedings
  3. Third Reading Passed
  4. Favorable Report by Judiciary
  5. Favorable Adopted Second Reading Passed
  6. Hearing 2/24 at 1:00 p.m.
  7. First Reading Judiciary
  8. Pre-filed

Sponsors

  • Schindler · sponsor
  • Behler
  • Miller
  • Pasteur

Bill text

Read the official text ↗

Opens the legislature’s own copy.

Similar bills in other states

Loading the map of where bills like this one were filed.

Share

Writing about this bill? Add a live status widget to your site or newsletter. It updates as the bill moves.

Track this bill

Get an email when HB 172 moves: committee action, floor votes, amendments and hearings. Free, no card.

Track HB 172 free

Or ask your AI assistant about HB 172 directly:

Add to Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor
Docket Room · Nonpartisan legislative tracking
Docket Room IntelligencePro

Ask about your legislation

I can analyze your tracked bills, upcoming hearings, and recent changes.

AI-generated · Nonpartisan · Not legal advice